[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Mar 2022 19:49:55 +0300 |
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, larsi@gnus.org, 54562@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 17:59:46 +0200
>
> >>>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:42:03 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
>
> >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> >> That might work. What would the fallback look like? Suppose we have 4
> >> diacritics, 3 of which are covered by the same font, and one by a
> >> different one. Would you prefer to attempt to use the font of 3 of
> >> them, or would you prefer to fall back to the font of the base
> >> character?
>
> Eli> I think I'd prefer to have the font that covers the majority.
>
> OK. Btw, the limit is a 3-character lookback, not 4 (although I guess
> we could always raise it).
Right. So with this trick we can support at most 3 diacritics on the
same base character.
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, (continued)
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/29
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/29
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/29
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/29
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/29
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Andreas Schwab, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Andreas Schwab, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Andreas Schwab, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Andreas Schwab, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/28
- bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed, Andreas Schwab, 2022/03/28