[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Jan 2022 19:57:48 +0200 |
> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattiase@acm.org>
> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 18:29:41 +0100
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, 53260@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> 2. Remove make_char_multibyte(c) from Bchar_syntax because it seems to be the
> wrong thing to do: in a unibyte buffer, wouldn't the syntax table be indexed
> by byte value (so that char 255 in the buffer corresponds to entry 255 in the
> syntax table rather than entry 0x3fffff)?
I don't think we want to support unibyte buffers which have some text
that is syntactically significant. A unibyte buffer is just a stream
of raw bytes, they are not characters.
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/14
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/15
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode, Stefan Monnier, 2022/01/15
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/15
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode, Stefan Monnier, 2022/01/15
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode [PATCH], Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/16
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode [PATCH], Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/01/20
- bug#53260: char-syntax differs in interpreter and bytecode [PATCH], Mattias Engdegård, 2022/01/20