[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52821: Should "(elisp) Keymaps" describe key sequences first?
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#52821: Should "(elisp) Keymaps" describe key sequences first? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Dec 2021 17:02:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
> Now that we promote the new keymap-* functions, does it really make
> sense to start the section (info "(elisp) Keymaps") with a description
> of key sequences?
>
> This seems to now be considered more of an internal detail, and the
> thing that should be exposed to (new) ELisp code is rather the new key
> description format accepted by `key-valid-p'.
>
> I'm thinking it should be moved further down, perhaps in a section next
> to this one:
>
> * Low-Level Key Binding:: Legacy key syntax description.
Yes, sounds good to me.
> There is a good description on the "new" key format in
> (info "(elisp) Changing Key Bindings"). Perhaps it should
> be moved up instead?
Yup.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no