bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#50344: C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log


From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: bug#50344: C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 14:08:20 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0

On 25.12.2021 14:37, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:

On 24.12.2021 16:57, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
Dmitry Gutov<dgutov@yandex.ru>  writes:

On 24.12.2021 14:56, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
Dmitry Gutov<dgutov@yandex.ru>   writes:

I have pushed the change which obsoletes vc-switch-backend now.
So what is the preferred way for switching to another vc backend from
28.1 onward?
I suppose it depends on your scenario.

Do you routinely use two different backends in certain
projects/directories?
Yes, when switching between some default vc backend such as git and
vc-backup (from ELPA) to work with backup files.

I haven't tried that package, but it's a little surprising that
vc-backup needs such a feature to be fully usable. I guess one option
would be for it to provide user commands, one of which which would
move it at the front of vc-handled-backends? An the other would undo
that action. Or just bundle a copy of vc-switch-backend under a
different name.

The package is still usable, you just don't get to work on backups when
your file is managed by some other version control system (unless you
want prioritise it over any other backend).  If it is the case, that
vc-switch-backend is rarely used, it seems like adding a custom
vc-backup-toggle-backend command to vc-backup would make the most sense.

Yes, we all thought it is rarely used.

But if you don't like both of those suggestions, my preferred plan
would be for you to continue using vc-switch-backend in Emacs 28. In
Emacs 29, we could un-obsolete it but put it on a different key
binding (such as 'C-x v B'), freeing 'C-x v b' for the prefix map for
branch operations.

Maybe I missed something, but would the issue be to just unbind the key,
without obsoleting it?  FWIW I would also appreciate having C-x v b
bound to branch commands.

You missed a bunch of comments in this bug discussion.

Unbinding without obsoleting makes sense to me, but not to Eli.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]