[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Dec 2021 12:58:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Bob Rogers <rogers-emacs@rgrjr.homedns.org> writes:
> So which do you prefer?
With a hyphen.
> I'm also looking at defining a date-parse-error condition with a few
> error symbol "subclasses," but I'm wondering about the tradeoff between
> having enough error symbols for precision in error reporting
> vs. cluttering the code with too many. Thoughts?
Having a `date-parse-error' would be fine, but I'm unsure about the
utility of having a bunch of sub-errors, but perhaps you have a use case
in mind?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, (continued)
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Michael Heerdegen, 2021/12/03
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Paul Eggert, 2021/12/04
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/19
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/20
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/20
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/20
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/21
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/23
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/24
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/24
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/25
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/26
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/28
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/29
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Paul Eggert, 2021/12/29
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/29
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/30
- bug#52209: 28.0.60; [PATCH] date-to-time fails on pure dates, Bob Rogers, 2021/12/30