bug#51497: 29.0.50; (vc-print-log) broken over TRAMP

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Even though it's plausible, I haven't encountered this particular use 
>> case so far. Perhaps when we do, we could mix-and-match :(literal) and 
>> --literal-pathspecs.
>
> So what would you suggest as the way forward, for both emacs-28 and
> the master branches (the 2 solutions could be different)?  Do you
> still prefer to go with your original patch for emacs-28?

This was the final message in this thread, and it was six weeks ago.  I
haven't paid attention to the patches in this area -- is this still an
issue, or has it been fixed?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no