bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:

> On 13.12.2021 19:16, Steingold wrote:
>> It seems much more reasonable to use pop-to-buffer in eshell rather than
>> break shell's behavior.
>
> That seems reasonable too.
>
> I think we'll do whatever the maintainers decide on this issue.

I think the current behaviour makes more sense than the old one, really.
For one, it's more predictable -- when you say `M-x shell', you're
getting a shell in the current buffer.  The old behaviour either does
that, or lands you in a different window (if you've already got a shell
buffer open elsewhere), right?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no