[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52580: 29.0.50; emoji-insert: no male/female alternatives available
|
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
bug#52580: 29.0.50; emoji-insert: no male/female alternatives available |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:46:21 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Welsh Duggan <mwd@md5i.com> writes:
> This appears to be due to a discrepancy in the `emoji--derived' data.
> The male/female variants exist, but they are indexed on the male
> version. For example:
>
> "🙍"
> ("🙍🏻" "🙍🏼" "🙍🏽" "🙍🏾" "🙍🏿")
> "🙍♂️"
> ("🙍🏻♂️" "🙍🏼♂️" "🙍🏽♂️" "🙍🏾♂️" "🙍🏿♂️" "🙍♀️" "🙍🏻♀️" "🙍🏼♀️"
> "🙍🏽♀️" "🙍🏾♀️" "🙍🏿♀️")
>
> These two lines from emoji-labels.el show the various PERSON FROWNING
> variants. The base ones are indexed on PERSON FROWNING, but the
> gendered variants are indexed on "man frowning".
Yup. I've now fixed this in Emacs 29.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no