[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3)
|
From: |
dick |
|
Subject: |
bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2021 06:32:27 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.14 (Gnus v5.14) Commercial/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
EZ> The amount of sqlite stuff in lisp.h is quite small... So I tend
EZ> to think a separate header is overkill.
Thinking about this in terms of number of bytes added to lisp.h is the
wrong way to think about it.
I agree that Lisp_Process, while important, doesn't belong in lisp.h.
That something as ancillary, third-party, and controversial as
Lisp_Sqlite does get into lisp.h is a testimony about its author.
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), dick . r . chiang, 2021/12/11
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3),
dick <=
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), dick, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), dick, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), dick, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), Phil Sainty, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/12
- bug#52440: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes (sqlite3), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/12