[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6 |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:47:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org>
>> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:29:00 +0100
>> Cc: 52240@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>>
>> > What about what it's actually complaining about, then? I.e.,
>> >
>> > (insert ?\N{left-to-right embedding})
>>
>> Sorry, I thought I had tried that already but didn't look carefully at
>> the result. When I do 'C-u C-x =' at the insertion, I get:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> position: 308 of 308 (100%), column: 37
>> character: (displayed as ) (codepoint 8234, #o20052, #x202a)
>> charset: unicode (Unicode (ISO10646))
>> code point in charset: 0x202A
>> script: symbol
>> syntax: w which means: word
>> category: L:Strong L2R
>> to input: type "C-x 8 RET 202a" or "C-x 8 RET LEFT-TO-RIGHT
>> EMBEDDING"
>> buffer code: #xE2 #x80 #xAA
>> file code: #xE2 #x80 #xAA (encoded by coding system utf-8-dos)
>> display: by this font (glyph code):
>>
>> harfbuzz:-outline-Symbola-regular-normal-normal-serif-12-*-*-*-p-*-iso10646-1
>> (#x875)
>>
>> Character code properties: customize what to show
>> name: LEFT-TO-RIGHT EMBEDDING
>> general-category: Cf (Other, Format)
>> decomposition: (8234) ('')
>
> Which is correct, right? or did you spot something problematic?
This is correct. So I eval'ed (C-x C-e) the example and the entries
in `glyphless--bidi-control-characters' :
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
?\N{latin small letter a with grave}
224 (#o340, #xe0)
?\N{right-to-left embedding}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable embedding})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{left-to-right override}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable override})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{right-to-left override}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable override})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{left-to-right isolate}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable isolate})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{right-to-left isolate}
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable isolate})
elisp--eval-last-sexp(nil)
eval-last-sexp(nil)
funcall-interactively(eval-last-sexp nil)
command-execute(eval-last-sexp)
?\N{first strong isolate}
8296 (#o20150, #x2068)
?\N{pop directional formatting}
8236 (#o20054, #x202c)
?\N{pop directional isolate}
8297 (#o20151, #x2069)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
It seems to me that something goes wrong when the unicode name contains
a hyphen? As a random example,
?\N{LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK}
also complains about (void-variable MARK}).
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Arash Esbati, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Arash Esbati, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Arash Esbati, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Arash Esbati, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6,
Arash Esbati <=
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Arash Esbati, 2021/12/02
- bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/12/02
bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/02
bug#52240: 29.0.50; Build failure after 35075267a6, Glenn Morris, 2021/12/02