[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connecti
From: |
Michael Albinus |
Subject: |
bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware? |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:43:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com> writes:
Hi Jim,
>> Thanks. However, you don't show the second setting,
>> comint-terminfo-terminal. Is it obvious to the reader that this shall be
>> changed as well?
>
> I didn't change it initially because I wasn't sure it's a value that
> people are likely to change connection-locally. `system-uses-terminfo'
> is definitely important to be able to set connection-locally: while
> many systems support terminfo, some don't (e.g. FreeBSD and MS
> Windows). `comint-terminfo-terminal' seemed less consequential.
>
> However, after doing a bit of archaeology, I think it might make sense
> to `comint-terminfo-terminal' connection-locally in the example, so
> I've attached an updated patch. `comint-terminfo-terminal' was only
> added in Emacs 26.1, and I believe the "dumb-emacs-ansi" terminfo file
> was added to Debian's ncurses after that, so it makes sense that
> someone would want to set this differently when connecting to a newer
> host vs an older host. (I think TERM=dumb-emacs-ansi is the best
> setting to use if your terminfo database has it, since it reflects
> comint's capabilities more accurately than TERM=dumb.)
>
> I didn't explain the above reasoning in the manual though, since it
> won't be so relevant as time goes on. Once people see that you can do
> this, it should hopefully be reasonably obvious why. If we need more
> explanation beyond this, it probably makes sense to expand the
> docstring for `comint-terminfo-terminal'.
Thanks. I've pushed your patch almost as-it-is to master (adding a
missing space).
Best regards, Michael.
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Jim Porter, 2021/10/26
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/27
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Jim Porter, 2021/10/27
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/28
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Jim Porter, 2021/10/28
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/28
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Jim Porter, 2021/10/29
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/29
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?, Jim Porter, 2021/10/29
- bug#51426: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Should 'comint-term-environment' be connection-aware?,
Michael Albinus <=