[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:35:25 +0200 |
> But the problem I'm seeing now is that the first time
> org-set-tags-command is executed its popup is correctly sized (with
> said workaround in place, of course), but further executions show a
> popup with the wrong geometry that trims part of the text off. If I
> remove the "just once" clause in the workaround, so that the redisplay
> is forced after each fit-window-to-buffer execution, then the layout
> is correct every time. It goes without saying that
> org-set-tags-command is ultimately triggering the execution of
> fit-window-to-buffer, but that stuff you probably know much better
> than me. Thing is, there was no enlargement of the modeline
> in-between, as far as I can understand and see nothing changed in this
> regard between the first and the second execution of
> org-set-tags-command.
I'm not sure I follow. What is the purpose of "the redisplay is forced
after each fit-window-to-buffer execution"? If you want a new mode line
height to be taken into account by 'fit-window-to-buffer', you probably
should do any such redisplay _before_ executing 'fit-window-to-buffer'.
Or what am I missing?
martin
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Carlos Pita, 2021/10/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2021/10/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Carlos Pita, 2021/10/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Carlos Pita, 2021/10/15
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Carlos Pita, 2021/10/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2021/10/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Carlos Pita, 2021/10/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2021/10/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Carlos Pita, 2021/10/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2021/10/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Carlos Pita, 2021/10/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Carlos Pita, 2021/10/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/17