[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#51131: 29.0.50; Segfault in ERT test
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#51131: 29.0.50; Segfault in ERT test |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Oct 2021 14:56:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't think that's the right fix. I added backtrace support in batch
> mode primarily for unit tests running on CI systems; this is exactly
> the situation where I want backtrace-on-error-noninteractive to be t.
> Can we revert commit 07edc28bdbfeeaeb1008b4fe21bfda586feae562 and find
> a better way?
ert wants to collect the backtrace, but the test itself subverted that
(by setting debug-on-error to nil and then having an error in the test).
I don't see why Emacs should output a backtrace inside a test like that.
But Emacs will still output
Error running tests
backtrace()
#f(compiled-function () #<bytecode -0x1fecd686855e18f0>)()
ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit()
command-line-1(("-l" "/tmp/test.el" "-f" "ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit"))
command-line()
normal-top-level()
at the end.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no