[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-c
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command |
Date: |
Mon, 17 May 2021 17:10:40 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: tsdh@gnu.org, 48404@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se
> Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 15:54:43 +0200
>
> >> >> (version-to-list "28.1 Magit/2.5")
> >> >
> >
> > The main purpose is to compare versions. How would you do that with
> > loose version strings such as the one above?
>
> We're looking at the Emacs version (which we'd put first in the version
> string, while the rest is essentially a free text used as a comment).
What do you mean by "first"? We already support the likes of
"28.3 Beta3", and "Beta3" is not ignored there as some free-text
comment.
And that is assuming the developers of 3rd-party packages can have
some reasonable way of associating their versions with Emacs versions,
which I still think is a problem with no solution.
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, (continued)
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Tassilo Horn, 2021/05/14
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/14
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/14
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/14
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/14
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/16
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/16
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/16
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/16
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/17
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/17
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/17
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/18
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Tassilo Horn, 2021/05/19
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/19
- bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/05/14
bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command, Stefan Kangas, 2021/05/14
bug#48404:, Daniel Mendler, 2021/05/14
bug#48404:, Daniel Mendler, 2021/05/14