[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33301: 27.0.50; broken elisp indentation for non-definition symbols
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#33301: 27.0.50; broken elisp indentation for non-definition symbols starting with "def.." |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:59:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> It means indenting some things in a different way than today? That
> leads to whitespace changes.
Hmmm, an indentation bug such as this is, by definition, about an
incorrect amount of ... whitespace. Right?
>>> I'd be against that -- again, because it leads to whitespace VC churn.
>> Again, I'm missing something: this option wouldn't lead to that, I think
> If some people have the variable set to 'insane, they would indent the
> code they're writing differently than the rest, which would lead to
> whitespace churn.
Well, they did set it to 'insane :-). I don't see the problem here,
this variable would be similar to indent-tabs-mode. If some people set
that differently it'll be equally disastrous. But anyway, we probably
don't need the variable since I don't expect out of tree code to be
particularly affected: that's because, according to code conventions,
definitions should start with a package-specific prefix anyway.
João