bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#42841: 28.0.50; [ruby-mode] ruby-{beginning,end}-of-block doesn't wo


From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: bug#42841: 28.0.50; [ruby-mode] ruby-{beginning,end}-of-block doesn't work as is exepected if arguments of method is divided into multi line
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 16:30:04 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

Version: 28.1

On 22.08.2020 05:17, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: bug#42841: 28.0.50; [ruby-mode] ruby-{beginning,end}-of-block 
doesn't work as is exepected if arguments of method is divided into multi line
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 03:26:15 +0300

I can't seem to reproduce this. Even after some intensive testing.

Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil

Could you perhaps provide a backtrace?

Type M-x toggle-debug-on-error, then trigger the error again.

I started emacs with '-Q' option and got following backtrace.

Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil)
   ruby-move-to-block(1)
   ruby-end-of-block(1)
   funcall-interactively(ruby-end-of-block 1)
   call-interactively(ruby-end-of-block nil nil)
   command-execute(ruby-end-of-block)

Oh, okay, I see it now. Couldn't reproduce it before because my config contains this line:

  (setq ruby-deep-indent-paren (delete ?\( ruby-deep-indent-paren))

Which logically shouldn't have any effect because we're not doing any indentation, but unfortunately does.

So I'm going to go ahead and try to fix it by removing the offending code. From some moderate testing, this doesn't seem to have any actual effect on indentation (the non-SMIE variant), and fixes the error. Let's see whether we get any breakage reports later.

Commit 2725254ab5.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]