[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#24940: [PATCH] Add should-call, should-not-call, and their tests
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#24940: [PATCH] Add should-call, should-not-call, and their tests |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:23:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com> writes:
>> I don't think our test suite should in general test whether some
>> functions are or aren't called during execution of the
>> command/function under test. That's because we are not interested in
>> the fine details of the implementation of the features being tested,
>> we are interested in whether it does what it's supposed to do. "What
>> it's supposed to do" means we should test the return values and the
>> side effects, a.k.a. "the behavior", and not how the code works
>> internally.
>
> I'll modify the tests I've written to focus on "the behavior".
Gemini, this was apparently never done? Did you abandon this patch in
favour of Phillip's assess package? (Which I see is in Melpa now.)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#24940: [PATCH] Add should-call, should-not-call, and their tests,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=