bug#32034: 26.1; [PACTH] better xref-location-marker for imperfect file locations

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> No.  I'm okay with your solution for 1 to go to emacs-26.  I had
> reservations about your solution for 2, but now I understand it won't
> affect the existing back-ends, so I'm okay with it on emacs-26, too
> (but will probably suggest a clearer message text if Dmitry agrees
> with the solution).
>
> 3 should indeed go to master.

This was over two years ago, and there was some followup discussion
between Dmitry and João, but I think the consensus here was that the
patches fixes a real problem, ans should probably be applied?  As far as
I can see, that never happened.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no