bug#30692: list-buffers has hardwired 80 character width from the 80's

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

>> Hm...  it it possible here for that list to be empty?  I thought not...
>>
>> I just find the seq-* functions to be more readable than (apply ...),
>> but I can change it to that if that's preferred here.
>
> -shrug- I just suggested it as a way of punting the autoload issues.

And it is indeed possible for that list to be empty, so I've changed the
code to your suggestion.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no