bug#41438: [PATCH] Allow windmove keys to be bound without prefix or modifiers

[Juri Linkov]

>>> I get what you were saying, but it seems the issue with windmove is the
>>> opposite. Just loading windmove shouldn't create any new keybindings,
>>> but customising the new user options should, *even if* windmove hasn't
>>> been loaded yet (ideally).
>>
>> Then it seems explicitly requiring windmove and autoloading variables
>> is unavoidable, so your previous patch was the right thing to do.
>
> The patch wasn't applied, though?  I know nothing about windmove, so I'm
> not really qualified to have an opinion, but if you think it's the right
> thing to do, then you should apply it?

Philip, could you please prepare the final version of your patch
(I see there were some unfinished parts in your previous patch).