[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Nov 2019 09:57:40 +0100 |
>> > I think fit-window-to-buffer relies on window's metrics (like the
>> > number of lines in the text area) to be up to date, and that is only
>> > true after a window was redisplayed once since changing the mode-line
>> > height. Martin, is this correct?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Then I'm not sure we can fix such use cases at all, without causing
> display flickering in much more popular use cases. Do you have any
> ideas for a possible fix? Could fit-window-to-buffer invoke
> 'redisplay' internally, perhaps?
It could but it's called way too often to warrant such behavior by
default. But we could give it a separate optional argument so users
can avoid the advice. I think Jonas could easily write and a test a
patch along this idea.
>> But, as I mentioned earlier, the problem shows up with the
>> scroll bar immediately when Jonas' form is evaluated, see the attached
>> screenshot.
>
> That just means we (or a Lisp program which makes these mode-line
> modifications) need to recreate and redisplay the scroll bars anew in
> these cases, right?
Right. But that same program could also redisplay all windows in
these cases, right?
> It's a separate problem, right?
For some value of right ...
martin
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, (continued)
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Jonas Bernoulli, 2019/11/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Jonas Bernoulli, 2019/11/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Jonas Bernoulli, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Jonas Bernoulli, 2019/11/17
bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account,
martin rudalics <=
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/16
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/17
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/17
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/17
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/17
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/18
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/18
- bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account, martin rudalics, 2019/11/18