|
From: | Hong Xu |
Subject: | bug#38026: [PATCH] Explain negative NABS in `goto-history-element'. |
Date: | Sat, 9 Nov 2019 10:48:54 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 |
On 11/9/19 1:46 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: 38026@debbugs.gnu.org From: Hong Xu <hong@topbug.net> Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 22:11:53 -0700So I think the text needs not reference minibuffer-default, but instead talk about "future history", like the Emacs manual does.Thanks. Sounds like a good idea. I've attached an update.Thanks, I pushed this, but please see how I fixed the log message, and also the additional fixes in my following commit. In particular, please always mention the bug number in the commit log message.
Thanks. I did a search on "future history" git grep 'future history' Except a result in Changelog, everywhere else uses `` and ''. doc/emacs/ChangeLog.1:5380:34: (Minibuffer History): Describe "future history" list. State default doc/emacs/mini.texi:647:25:as moving through the ``future history''. doc/emacs/mini.texi:649:9:@cindex future history for file names doc/emacs/mini.texi:652:9: The ``future history'' for file names includes several possible doc/emacs/mini.texi:660:19:value, then the ``future history'' of file names will include only the doc/lispref/minibuf.texi:144:9:@cindex future history in minibuffer input doc/lispref/minibuf.texi:148:3:``future history'', available to the user with @kbd{M-n}. doc/lispref/minibuf.texi:2312:49:can go beyond the current position and invoke ``future history'' lisp/simple.el:2134:45:negative number -N means the Nth entry of \"future history.\"" Are you sure that we should change them to " in the newly added doc? Hong
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |