bug#26626: 24.5; doc of `last-command-event' and `last-nonmenu-event'

[Drew Adams]

> > There's no such thing as a "command key sequence",
> > as opposed, one imagines, to a "non-command key
> > sequence".
> 
> It's just what you said in the OP: "the key sequence that
> invoked/initiated a command".

Yes, that's still the best way to put it, I think.

> > I still think that the text for this should borrow
> > from what is said for `last-nonmenu-event'.  IIUC,
> > `last-command-event' is the "last input event read
> > as part of a key sequence".
> 
> That would be misleading.

You're right.  It's the first input event read
as part of a key sequence - not the last such.

The larger point was that it is an input event
read as part of a key sequence.  But yes, you're
absolutely right that the text for
`last-nonmenu-event' needs more of a tweak than
the one I gave it.