bug-gne
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom


From: Christopher Mahan
Subject: Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:09:19 -0800



From: Alexander Braun <address@hidden>

->However, GNE could take proactive action and specifically ask the agencies
->or departments in various countries to "check" the articles for legality.
->These government-controlled agencies could then decide, based on the article
->content:
->  -illegal/legal to host in servers located in this country.
-> -illegal/legal to display on browser viewed by a citizen of this country.
->

But if we reject illegal stuff from some countries, we would run the risk
of just filtering out a lot of other stuff - e.g. a lot of stuff about
democracy because it might be not viewed in China.

I was just thinking of an authorization system: authorized articles aren't
edited unauthorized articles are edited. authorization by sth. like gpg.
But that lead me only to the problem in another shape: then we would have
to edit the articles that are not authorized - and we would have the same
problems. I just mention it now, because perhaps somebody has a better
idea.

BTW. even linking might be illegal.


Well, I just mentioned that.

I think the article would be available, just not in that country.
Well, actually, it would be available, after a HUGE giant "THIS ARTICLE IS BANNED" sign at the front door.

Also, that country's banning of that article might make for an interesting read: Read articles banned in China, for example. This could become a hall of shame.

Linking would only be done throught the GNE central server, and that server would know if the article linked to is banned in the destination country.

The Chinese, for example, might ban an article on Tibetan Monks, but only Chinese readers in China would be affected by the ban. Everybody else would see the article without problem.

This could also be a mark of distinction appearing on the article itself: "Banned by the Chinese Government"

Chris
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]