[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia
From: |
Alexander Braun |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:30:12 +0100 (CET) |
Hi Tom,
in a way I share your opinion in a way I share Paul's
->I can see the appeal of idealism here, but there's a practical difficulty as
->well.
I share this idealism. But I think you got the point.
One ofthe prerequisites is the thought of mirroring GNE - and I hope
someday I'm able to do this. And that's the point I'm concerned about.
On the one hand I think the freedom to write what I want is the highest
goal. On the other I want to mirror the sites and not review every page,
if it is a potential danger to my (also physical) freedom.
In Germany it's stricly forbidden to publish the holocaust-lie. I am sure
that a lot of people will republish better articles if one of the NAZI's
put such crap in GNE. Anyway - I got then this original article on my
server and risk penalty without any sense in it. If I edit the site I
betray my own consciousness. If I don't I betray my family (because they
would actually suffer most from any penalty). It's a difficult situation.
And not to mirror the site if I got the technical prerequisites would also
betray my philosophical background.
Unfortunately their actually exist so called illegal contents. (Though I
don't know how information or non-information can be illegal). Pedastry is
another one and as far as I know it's also illegal in the US. So let's
take this example. What if anybody puts a report on GNE how many different
ways exist to abuse children - illustrated of course. (I for myself share
the rage against this content and I am glad it is illegal - but that's
only my opinion)
So wouldn't it be a damage for the project in the end ? Would GNE not risk
to lose the fight for freedom while allowing it with all consequences?
I would be glad to get some handy reasons against that - not only to
convince myself, but also to convince friends who could write articles
or join technical efforts
greetings
alex
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Jean-Daniel Fekete, 2001/02/12
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Tom Chance, 2001/02/12
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Alexander Braun, 2001/02/13
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Tom Chance, 2001/02/13
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Hook, 2001/02/13
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Tom Chance, 2001/02/13
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia,
Alexander Braun <=
- [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom, Tom Chance, 2001/02/13
- Re: [Bug-gne]the problem of illegal content vs. freedom, Mike Warren, 2001/02/13
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Mike Warren, 2001/02/13
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Mike Warren, 2001/02/12
- Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Tom Chance, 2001/02/10
RE: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Christopher Mahan, 2001/02/11
RE: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, Christopher Mahan, 2001/02/11
RE: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia, hooker, 2001/02/11