[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format
From: |
Imran Ghory |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:11:48 -0000 |
On 29 Jan 2001, at 12:42, Mike Warren wrote:
> "Hook" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Now I *know* you're joking ! Have you actually *tried* that? And
> > actually displayed the result, or, even worse, looked at the
> > resulting HTML -- it's barely stardard, has huge amount of
> > superfluous junk (including MS-only font definitions), and has no
> > structure at all.
>
> If we decide to accept HTML as a submission format, then we must be
> prepared to deal with any conforming HTML, no matter how ``yucky'' it
> might be.
I assume that we're only going to support a subset of html,
otherwise conversion to other formats and potential for abuse could
be largely increased.
Imran
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, Hook, 2001/01/29
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, Mike Warren, 2001/01/29
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format,
Imran Ghory <=
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, Alexander Braun, 2001/01/30
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, Mike Warren, 2001/01/29
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, Soam Vasani, 2001/01/28
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, Mike Warren, 2001/01/29
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/29
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Submissions in Word Format, Tom Chance, 2001/01/29