[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]More on article persistence
|
From: |
Rajarshi Guha |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia]More on article persistence |
|
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:40:40 +0530 (IST) |
On 29 Jan 2001, Mike Warren wrote:
> Untrue. The very concept of the FDL is to allow changes, and this is
> why different versions of articles will be not only possible but
> greatly encouraged. Of what use is this repository if you can't update
> articles with the latest information?
Thidea of information update is good and should be encouraged - but by
whom? Who gets credit for the article? Who would be cited?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha | Avoid strange women and temporary
Dept Of Chemistry, | variables.
IIT Kharagpur. |
|
email: address@hidden |
web : www.psynet.net/jijog |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------