From: Pulp <address@hidden>
Reply-To: address@hidden
To: <address@hidden>
Subject: [Bug-gnupedia]Re: Bug digest #84 - msg 4/16
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:05:44 -0500 (EST)
> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:40:29 -0800 (PST)
> From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Tom=20Chance?= <address@hidden>
> > our thinking on what could be a resource. Another
> > type of resource might be an external link to an
> > Internet-based resource which is External to GNE. I
> > think participants should be able to submit those
> > types of resources as well.
>
> NO external links! Not until we can insure we won't
> have broken links and links to sites that violate (or
> in future change and violate) our own policies.
Just to be stubborn and pound my own idea again:
I feel (agree?) that we shouldn't have external links as primary
resources. I think it would be appropriate to allow external links as
references in articles, so long as we clearly distinguish between internal
links and external links. We could then make it clear that external links
are in no way cared-for or under the umbrella of the GNUPedia.
But, hey, even that may be a bit too liberal. Dunno. A thought, anyway.
+---+ With great effort, you move the boulder. ################
|..$| # Josh Millard #
|.@'.##########################################################
|<d.| # address@hidden # www.wpi.edu/~pulp - music, words, etc #
+---+ ########################################################
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnupedia mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupedia