Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Changes to articles

[Mike Warren]

Tom Chance <address@hidden> writes:

> If people change their own article, no problem. Though re-moderation
> is an issue. Somebody could write a reasonably small article on
> PASCAL, and then alter it planting a binary bomb or doing something
> silly to it.

That falls under my ``existing moderation system'' comment. Beyond
keeping spam out, there needs to be no moderation.

> If people want to "edit" somebody else's article, it should be
> allowed by all means, and should be linked to at the top/bottom (?)
> of the article with a breif description of what the author edited.

It would be up to the classifiers which version(s) of the article they
want.

> These should also be moderated to prvent it from turning into a
> discussion board.

No, they shouldn't be moderated beyond possibly obvious-spam-prevention.

-- 
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A  0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD