[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnupedia]Scientific Quoting
From: |
Klaus-Juergen Wolf |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnupedia]Scientific Quoting |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:08:56 +0100 |
Hallo,
excuse me, short question: Is there a standard for quoting in GNUpedia
articles? I think of scientific quoting, footnotes, etc.
I, personally, rather dislike people who write a bunch of personal
opinions or literal (but unmarked) quotes and declare them as common
knowledge and final truth. A horror!
I think, articles like that cannot be good for an encyclopedia.
Other question: what style of articles is being preferred? How verbose,
how detailed, what kind of reader do we have to write for? Is there any
prototype?
Regards,
k.j.
--
This message (C) by Author. Unauthorized distribution prohibited!
gpg: 3174 6645 CB62 EB5E 2DB6 0DF5 A42C 16D4 C420 31E5
- [Bug-gnupedia]Scientific Quoting,
Klaus-Juergen Wolf <=