[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format
From: |
Mike Warren |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format |
Date: |
27 Jan 2001 12:49:13 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
"Hook" <address@hidden> writes:
> .. and RTF (for what it's worth). I disagree with this for
> practical reasons. Most people have access to MickeySoft products,
> and regardless of how little some of us like them, they *are*
> pervasive, and I don't think that what amounts to a religious
> doctrine (free or nothing) should get in the way of the practical
> needs of receiving articles.
However, solutions exist for these people to produce an acceptable
submission format. Do RMS, FSF or GNU have a policy on this?
--
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A 0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD
- [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/24
- [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Jean-Daniel Fekete, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Rob Scott, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Tom Chance, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Rob Scott, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Tom Chance, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Tom Chance, 2001/01/24