Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML??

[Mike Warren]

"Hook" <address@hidden> writes:

> Which realistically, you won't often get. An XML DTD with the tools
> to make use of it is by far the easiest solution. The DTD I'm sure
> we can come up with (recognising that it's going to evolve as we see
> the need), the tools are a problem right now. I can't think of a
> single word processor which outputs usable XML.

I wouldn't want *anyone* to suffer making XML; we should provide tools
which convert well-known formats into our DTD. There is a Python
XML/SAX parser underway, although I'm not sure how far along it is.

-- 
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A  0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD