[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions
From: |
Hector Facundo Arena |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:05:53 -0300 |
We only need the author's name and email for giving credit.
>
> Back up and ask the following question: Why do you need to pin down who
> the author is? Possible answers: Giving credit, copyright ownership,
> passing along legal issues, borrowing credentials, preventing or
> controlling collaboration... Then for each ask, are there more than one
> way to do it? Will everyone wish to do it one way, or will some wish
> for a different way? If GnuPedia can only support a single way of doing
> it, can they afford losing those articles that cannot comply? What is
> gained from verification? If someone works around your verification
> system, how badly does that compromise things? Is it important to
> maintain a one-to-one author-article relationship, or is it acceptable
> to have community ownership of the articles, and not worry as much about
> the author?
>
> Bryce
- [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Christopher Mahan, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Tom Chance, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Mike Warren, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/25
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Mike Warren, 2001/01/25
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/25
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Submissions, Mike Warren, 2001/01/25