Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Re: A Detailed Proposal - Mk I

[volsung]

On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Simon Cross wrote:

> - Getting reviewers:  My proposal has a kind of "Catch 22" problem
> inherent in it.  How do we get reviewers when we have no articles, and how
> do we get articles when we have no reviewers?  The solution to the
> conundrum is that articles do not need any reviewers to be submitted.  I
> stated in my proposal that authors would be responsible for the review of
> their own articles.  It is, however, possible for reviews to be added
> without the author.  Thus when the GNUPedia review teams get up and
> running they can go around reviewing and approving articles.  We will need
> to iron out the details of allowing people other than the author(s) to
> organise reviews.

At first, I'm thinking that article writers in a particular category can
review each other's articles.  In essence, the core of the article writing
team is also the article reviewing team.  Later on, the two could diverge,
with the article reviewing team probably being larger.

---
Stan Seibert