Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Data Model

[<address@hidden>]

> On Wed, 17 January 2001, Bob Dodd wrote:
> > 
> > Thinking of what I would need to help catalog the information, 
> > I'd want to get at: title, abstract (if it's a long entry), 
> > authors/main authors, citations, references to external peer 
> > reviews, keywords, synonyms, target audience/assumed knowledge, 
> > publication date, source journal if this material has been 
> > published before, copyright text. Oh, and the content itself, 
> > mustn't forget that...
> 
> I'd drop the target audience/assumed knowledge category. It's 
> too subjective based on the knowledge of the poster of the 
> article. Everything else looks to be very good choices, although 
> for keywords, if it hasn't appeared in the first X hundred words 
> of the article (X = 2 - 4) then it is probably only tangentially
> related to the article.

You appear to be assuming that the language of the keywords and the language 
of the document are necessarily the same which is not the case.

staurt




--    stuart yeates <address@hidden> aka `loam'
"Oh, havoc," cried Pooh, as he let slip the heffalumps of war.
X-no-archive:yes