[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnupedia] Re: [Bug-gnupedia]blind reviews
From: |
Dries van Oosten |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnupedia] Re: [Bug-gnupedia]blind reviews |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:33:29 +0100 (MET) |
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Tom Tollenaere wrote:
> We do have to find a way to prevent discussions about what/whatnot, and things
> should move reasonably fast. What about setting up a pool of blinded and
> to-be-reviewed
> articles? Anybody (or anybody registered, should we want to go that way)
> could take stuff from the pool and review it. Get a good review, it gets
> published, get a bad review it either gets published or stays in the pool
> until it gets either too many bad reviews and get booted, or gets enough
> reviews to get published?
>
> I would say that good reviews should balance bad ones... what I don't like
> might be what you like - if there is enough consensus to 'like' something
> then I should not have the right to boot something for reasons of dislike...
>
> We *are* getting into difficult territory here - I hope we all realize that
> no system is ever going to be perfect, or abuse-free....
The double blind pool thing is a good idea.
Groeten,
Dries