Re: [Bug-glpk] 0-ary slice not allowed

[xypron]

Hello Andrew,

>> Just for clarity.
>> Do you agree that the following notation is meaningless?
>> sum{(2,3) in E} c[i,j] * x[i,j] 

The following model is correctly solved by GLPK:

set E := {(2,3)};
var v{(i,j) in E};
s.t. con1 {(i,j) in E} : v[i,j] - sum{(2,k) in E : k == j} 1 = 0;
var w{(i,j) in E};
s.t. con2 {(i,j) in E} : w[i,j] - sum{(k,3) in E : k == i} 1 = 0;
solve;
display v,w;

Why shoudn't
s.t. con1 {(i,j) in E} : v[i,j] - sum{(2,3) in E} 1 = 0;
work?

Best regards

Xypron


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/0-ary-slice-not-allowed-tp20707760p20710546.html
Sent from the Gnu - GLPK - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.