[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments in .notfunction?
From: |
Shigio YAMAGUCHI |
Subject: |
Re: Comments in .notfunction? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:38:18 +0900 |
Hello,
I'm worried you may not be able to handle function names that
start with a '#'.
How about using ';'? I don't think using ';' at the beginning of
a function name cannot happen in any language.
[.notfunction]
;
; The names given here are not considered functions.
;
main
funcx
Regards,
Shigio
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:23 AM Miller, Matt (SCON)
<Matt.Miller2@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> Based on a very quick glance of the code (version 6.6.6), it looks like in
> load_notfunction(), the STRBUF_SHARPSKIP flag could be added to the
> strbuf_fgets() call to support '#' prefixed comment lines in .notfunction:
>
>
>
> 83 for (tablesize = 0; (p = strbuf_fgets(ib, ip, STRBUF_NOCRLF)) !=
> NULL; tablesize++)
>
> 84 strbuf_puts0(sb, p);
>
>
>
> If that evaluation is correct, we were wondering if that would be a minor
> enhancement worth tracking.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Matt
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <shigio@gnu.org>
PGP fingerprint:
26F6 31B4 3D62 4A92 7E6F 1C33 969C 3BE3 89DD A6EB