[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Deletion of two options.
From: |
Shigio Yamaguchi |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Deletion of two options. |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:23:29 +0900 |
This is a self-follow-up mail.
> How about removing the following two options.
>
> The -o(--omit-gsyms) option for gtags(1).
> Suppress making 'GSYMS' file. Use this option if you don't use
> -s option of global(1).
> The -s(--symbol) option for htags(1).
> Make anchors not only for functions but also other symbols.
> 'GSYMS' tag file needed.
>
> Above two options were necessary in the past to use the program
> in a incompetent machine with small hard disk. But most recent machines
> has powerful CPU and mass hard disk. These options might already be
> unnecessary. Additionally, these options are troublesome, since they are
> mutually related.
I withdraw the above opinion concering the -s option of htags(1).
I cannot ignore the fact that htags can finish the job at half time
if symbol link is not required. While using GLOBAL-current, I came
to think that the -s option of htags(1) is needed.
Thus, I want to recover the -s option.
What do you think?
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [RFC] Deletion of two options.,
Shigio Yamaguchi <=