[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall()
From: |
arnold |
Subject: |
Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall() |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Sep 2022 02:26:11 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: arnold@skeeve.com
> > Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 01:07:52 -0600
> > Cc: jnaman2@gmail.com, bug-gawk@gnu.org
> >
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > From: arnold@skeeve.com
> > > > Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 00:45:48 -0600
> > > > Cc: eliz@gnu.org
> > > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > This does not reproduce on x86_64 under Linux or MacOS. It also
> > > > doesn't reproduce on Linux if I compile gawk in 32 bit mode.
> > > >
> > > > Eli - Can you take a look please?
> > >
> > > I get the same error as the OP.
> >
> > So, can you please point a debugger at it to try to figure out what's
> > happening?
>
> Doesn't the error message tell what is happening?
>
> If not, where to look for more details?
>
> Btw, if I compile Gawk without optimizations, the readall program
> succeeds(?) in the unoptimized version, and produces the following
> output:
>
> arr1: len=0
> 0 = readall("foo.binawk");
> arr1: len=0
>
> Does this help?
I will take it from here. Thanks
Arnold
Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), arnold, 2022/09/11
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), Andrew J. Schorr, 2022/09/11
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), Andrew J. Schorr, 2022/09/11
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), arnold, 2022/09/13
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), J Naman, 2022/09/13
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), Andrew J. Schorr, 2022/09/13
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), arnold, 2022/09/14
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), Andrew J. Schorr, 2022/09/14
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), Andrew J. Schorr, 2022/09/26
- Re: fatal: internal error Ver 5.2.0 readall(), arnold, 2022/09/28