[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts
From: |
Eric Pruitt |
Subject: |
Re: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts |
Date: |
Sat, 7 May 2022 13:45:53 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 01:14:09PM -0600, arnold@skeeve.com wrote:
> You are the only one (that I remember) that has found MPFR support in
> gawk to be of practical use. There may be others, and if the deprecation
> causes a flood of complaints from legitimate users, I will reconsider.
How often do people post messages on the list praising a particular
feature? I find MPFR support useful, and I similarly find the "match"
function useful, but it never occurred to me that use of either feature
warranted proactive communication.
Eric
- RE: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts, Carl Friedberg, 2022/05/05
- RE: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts, Neil R. Ormos, 2022/05/06
- Re: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts, arnold, 2022/05/07
- Re: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts,
Eric Pruitt <=
- Re: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts, Eric Pruitt, 2022/05/07
- Re: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts, Andrew J. Schorr, 2022/05/07
- Re: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts, Eric Pruitt, 2022/05/07
- RE: [gawk-devel] MPFR thoughts, pjfarley3, 2022/05/08
- Extension packaging, arnold, 2022/05/08
- RE: Extension packaging, pjfarley3, 2022/05/10
- Re: Extension packaging, Manuel Collado, 2022/05/10
- Re: Extension packaging, Andrew J. Schorr, 2022/05/10
- Re: Extension packaging, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/05/10
- Re: Extension packaging, Andrew J. Schorr, 2022/05/10