[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] find.1: avoid misunderstanding of `-prtinf %Ak` description
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] find.1: avoid misunderstanding of `-prtinf %Ak` description |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Oct 2020 00:36:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 |
Hi Kamil,
On 2020-10-06 17:10, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> * find/find.1 (-printf): Make it clear that strftime() format
> description in this man page is incomplete and refer to the
> strftime() documentation instead.
>
> Suggested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1882695
> ---
> find/find.1 | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/find/find.1 b/find/find.1
> index ee7c6842..0bc882b3 100644
> --- a/find/find.1
> +++ b/find/find.1
> @@ -1420,9 +1420,8 @@ File's last access time in the format returned by the C
> `ctime' function.
> File's last access time in the format specified by
> .IR k ,
> which is either `@' or a directive for the C `strftime' function.
> -The possible values for \fIk\fR are listed below;
> -some of them might not be available on all systems,
> -due to differences in `strftime' between systems.
> +Below is an excerpt of possible values for \fIk\fR. For full list
> +please refer to documentation of `strftime'.
> .RS
> .IP @
> seconds since Jan.\& 1, 1970, 00:00 GMT, with fractional part.
Thanks for the patch.
I prefer to keep the sentence that the supported list of conversion
specifiers may vary among different systems.
Reading the original bug report, I found it useful to add the 'F'
conversion specifier - yielding the IMO quite useful 'yyyy-dd-mm'
date format.
Finally, I added similar clarification to the Texinfo manual.
May I push the attached in your name?
Thanks & have a nice day,
Berny
0001-doc-avoid-misunderstanding-of-printf-Ak-description.patch
Description: Text Data