|
From: | James Youngman |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: This week's NEWS |
Date: | Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:16:15 +0100 |
On 6/3/07, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
> The reason for this is that find may or may not change CWD as it goes, > depending on which binary you are running and how it is configured > (e.g. the value of ftsoptions in ftsfind.c, the availability of > /proc/N/fd, and whether you are running the "find" or "oldfind" > binary). Yuck. But ignoring ENOENT is not the right way to handle this, is it?
Ignoring ENOENT relates to the readdir() race condition, not to the CWD. James.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |