bug-diffutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug-diffutils] bug#18402: bug#18402: bug#18402: Wrong output for single


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: [bug-diffutils] bug#18402: bug#18402: bug#18402: Wrong output for single character files without newline
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:34:15 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0

Jim Meyering wrote:
I also tried with two copies of the output of "seq 9999999" on a
tmpfs file system, with the same result: no discernible difference.

There is something weird going on, as I can't reproduce my earlier results. Perhaps I built one version of 'diff' without optimization and the other one with it, by accident. Sorry about sending you down a wild goose chase.

I'm still seeing a significant performance improvement due to the change, though not as dramatic as what I earlier reported. Here's the benchmark:

$ seq 100000000 >0
$ cp 0 1
$ time ./diff-old 0 1

real    0m2.540s
user    0m1.055s
sys     0m1.464s
$ time ./diff-new 0 1

real    0m1.734s
user    0m0.256s
sys     0m1.463s

where 'diff-old' and 'diff-new' are the old (b6e691277288c4e8d53b1d2577137d265008d13e) and current (df3af29627a92495a740da13cb8bb0d4fcc1bf84) versions of diffutils, both compiled with plain 'configure; make' on the same Fedora 20 x86-64 platform I mentioned earlier. This is on an ext4 file system that is built atop a mirrored hard-disk subsystem, and the locale is en_US.utf8 (dunno if any of this matters).

This benchmark is dominated by system CPU time, so the new version is only about 45% faster than the old if one looks at real time, but it's still clearly a win as the user CPU time about 4x faster.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]