|
From: | Antonio Diaz Diaz |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-ddrescue] [PATCH 2/7] treewide: Replace size() with empty() where appropriate |
Date: | Wed, 16 Oct 2019 22:10:51 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 |
Rosen Penev wrote:
For vectors and strings (what ddrescue uses) empty() is defined as 'size() == 0'. So nothing is gained with this change.I agree it's the same. Whether it's cleaner or not is subjective.
I generally find cleaner to avoid negations: if( foo.size() && bar.size() ) if( !foo.empty() && !bar.empty() )
I can resubmit if you would like. My guess is no.
You guess well. :-) I never apply patches like this one. I directly modify the parts of the code that I think the patch improves, and ignore the rest.
Best regards, Antonio.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |