[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-ddrescue] Correct usage of ddrescue options?
From: |
James W. Watts |
Subject: |
[Bug-ddrescue] Correct usage of ddrescue options? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:09:58 -0700 (PDT) |
Hello,
I sent a post last week asking for help rescuing my friend's dead XP NTFS hard
drive via ddrescue
on Knoppix. I'm still working on it. Wanted to ask about ddrescue's options.
Specifically, here is
the command I issue in Knoppix. I'm writing the image onto a freshly DBAN'ed
and NTFS-partitioned
hard drive with plenty of space to hold the complete image of the damaged drive.
sudo ddrescue --max-retries=3 --verbose /damaged_drive /rescue_drive/rescue.img
/rescue_drive/rescue_log.txt
These options have produced several workable images for me in the past. And
even this time, I'm
getting a successful read (with no errors) of the damaged drive -- all 80GB of
it. But maybe this
command needs revision. What command options do you use? Anything more strict?
Please examine this
command and let me know what you think.
Last week, Antonio suggested that the filesystem could be damaged. And Jason
suggested using The
Sleuthkit (TSK) for potential diagnosis/recovery. I downloaded TSK and read
through the
documentation. But I did not see which tools could locate and/or repair a
damaged NTFS partition.
How can you fix a damaged NTFS partition when you're working with an image file?
Thank you,
James
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug-ddrescue] Correct usage of ddrescue options?,
James W. Watts <=