[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: forcing revision numbers
From: |
Stephen Rasku |
Subject: |
Re: forcing revision numbers |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:24:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Larry Jones wrote:
>Stephen Rasku writes:
>>
>> The code in question doesn't get tested that much anyways since you
>> aren't supposed to use it.
>
>Not true -- the test suite (which we run every night on a bunch of
>different platforms) tests it. Unfortunately, the one test that
would
>have detected the reported bug had been perverted to check for the
buggy
>behavior (it noted it as a bug but did not have a prominent FIXCVS
>comment to indicate that it needed to be fixed).
>
Is the test suite is fixed now?
--
Stephen Rasku E-mail: stephen@tgivan.com
Senior Software Engineer Web: http://www.pop-star.net/
TGI Technologies
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- RE: forcing revision numbers, Cameron, Steve, 2001/07/10
- RE: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10
- Re: forcing revision numbers,
Stephen Rasku <=
- Re: forcing revision numbers, Stephen Rasku, 2001/07/10