[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts)
From: |
Karl Tomlinson |
Subject: |
Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts) |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:14:50 +1300 |
Karl Tomlinson wrote:
>
> 2&3)
>
> Both depend on a difference between files that can be represented
> by more than one minimal hunk.
>
> An example is
>
> Difference A:
>
> 1 2
>
> x y
> m m
> x y
> m
> y
>
> Does the m in file 1 match the first or second m in file 2?
>
> The logic in diag and compareseq is not consistent in analyze.c.
> The match selected depends on where in the file this difference occurs
> and on the surrounding differences.
>
It seems more complicated than I thought. I haven't been able to
come up with any examples based on differences such as this or
variations.
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), (continued)
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/07
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Karl Tomlinson, 2001/02/07
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/08
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Karl Tomlinson, 2001/02/08
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Jacob Burckhardt, 2001/02/08
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/16
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Jacob Burckhardt, 2001/02/16
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Derek R. Price, 2001/02/16
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Karl Tomlinson, 2001/02/18
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts),
Karl Tomlinson <=
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Karl Tomlinson, 2001/02/20
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Karl Tomlinson, 2001/02/20
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Jacob Burckhardt, 2001/02/21
- Re: Merging bug (wrong conflicts), Karl Tomlinson, 2001/02/21