bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#70231: Performance issue on sort with zero-sized pseudo files


From: Takashi Kusumi
Subject: bug#70231: Performance issue on sort with zero-sized pseudo files
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 11:52:17 +0900
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Hi,

I have found a performance issue with the sort command when used on
pseudo files with zero size. For instance, sorting `/proc/kallsyms`, as
demonstrated below, takes significantly longer than executing with
`cat`, generating numerous temporary files. I confirmed this issue on
v8.32 as well as on commit 8f3989d in the master branch.

  $ time cat /proc/kallsyms | sort > /dev/null
  real    0m0.954s
  user    0m0.873s
  sys     0m0.096s

  $ time sort /proc/kallsyms > /dev/null
  real    0m8.555s
  user    0m3.367s
  sys     0m5.064s

  $ strace -e trace=openat sort /proc/kallsyms 2>&1 > /dev/null \
    | grep /tmp/sort | head -100
  ...
  openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/sortM6Y6Y1", ...
  openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/sortPrHKMG", ...

  $ strace -e trace=openat -c sort /proc/kallsyms > /dev/null
  % time     seconds  usecs/call     calls    errors syscall
  ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
  100.00    6.419777          19    333258         8 openat
  ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
  100.00    6.419777          19    333258         8 total

It appears that the buffer size allocated for pseudo files with zero
size is insufficient, likely because it is based on their file size,
which is zero. As seen in the attached patch, I think using
`INPUT_FILE_SIZE_GUESS` to calculate the buffer size when the file size
is zero would resolve this issue.

Best regards,
Takashi Kusumi

Attachment: 0001-sort-fix-performance-issue-on-zero-sized-pseudo-file.patch
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]