bug#45648: `dd` seek/skip which way is up?

[Bernhard Voelker]

On 1/5/21 3:06 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 1/4/21 3:07 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> What 'dd' implementation was this specifically?
> 
> Solaris dd has iseek and oseek. However, they are not aliases for skip 
> and seek. If coreutils dd were to add these features I expect we should 
> do them the Solaris way, instead of making them aliases for skip and 
> seek. This would take more work than the proposed patches.
> 
> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E36784_01/html/E36871/dd-1m.html

That would make the situation even more confusing for the user
... and more complex because such implementation would interfere
with GNU dd's seek/skip and iflag=skip_bytes and oflag=skip_bytes
functionality.  Doesn't sound like a good idea.

Have a nice day,
Berny